(catching up) > The critical observation to make here is as IPv6 addresses are tried > first (I'm simplifying; it's more complex than that), one must cycle > through all the addresses, before trying with IPv4. However, IPv4 > connections might still work! With TCP timeouts, this takes a lot of > time --- and should be made quicker. Speaking personally, I think what you have written is fine and would not block the document on it. > There is going to be a WG last call on the document soon, aimed for > Informational -- just for documenting the issues. The actual fixes > (or not) would have to be done elsewhere (e.g., in TCPM WG ;-). Speaking as tcpm co-chair, yeah - we'd certainly be game to help out here. allman -- Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature