Re: Multiple tunneling protocols on the same Ipv4 address )Re: ISATAP, v6inv4 and 6to4 tunnel interworkings [RE: ISATAP vs alter natives in 3GPP [Re: comments on draft-ietf-v6 ops-3gpp-analysis-09.txt] ]

[Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>]

On Mar 30, 2004, at 10:05 AM, Fred Templin wrote:

> Alain,
>
> Appreciate the thoughts. As to your assertion of not seeing a 
> compelling,
> practical case I tend to disagree with that as a sufficiently strong 
> arguement
> towards disallowing multiple tunneling protocols anchored to the  same
> IPv4 address.  So, my leaning is toward your suggestion of a 
> prioritized
> set of rules, or something similar.

Fred,

Could you provide an example where anchoring two or more tunneling 
protocols
on the same IPv4 interface makes real sense and cannot be done 
differently?

	- Alain.