On Apr 15, 2004, at 10:55 AM, Fred Templin wrote:
Alain Durand wrote:
On Apr 15, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Karim El-Malki (HF/EAB) wrote:
You wouldn't need or want a NAT for that.
Yes I want it for my IPv4 connections.
I'm OK with this, as long as you clearly distinguish "IPv4 connections" from IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling.
??? Please elaborate.
Only that, from the perspective of IPv6-in-IPv4 tunneling, it would be nice if any "NATs" behaved more like an ND Proxy.
This would not be the same thing as an "IPv6 NAT", which I hope we will never see.
Fred ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com