Re: Scenarios analysis documents: BCP vs Informational?

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Tim Chown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 04:17:07PM +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >  a) continue with BCP category,
> > 
> >  b) publish 3GPP analysis as Informational and consider the rest in 
> >     case-by-case basis (whether Info or BCP).  Some other analysis 
> >     documents may or may not fall better under the BCP category, or
> > 
> >  c) publish 3GPP analysis as Informational; take the rest to 
> >     informational as well.
> > 
> > Opinions?  a), b), or c)?
> 
> While BCP should be just that, the analyses miss the P on a big scale, so
> I also agree Informational, with maybe in 12-18 months a BCP update once
> we see which methods win out?

At least for the ISP analysis document, I believe it quite accurately
describes _Best_, _Current_ and even _Practice_ :).

At least to the degree of how you deploy your core network (customer
access networks w/ tunneling is still behind..).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings