RE: POLL: Consensus for moving forward with Teredo?

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

We must work on Teredo, ISATAP, DSTM, and Tunnel Broker.  All are being
deployed all will exist.  So I vote for (a) but I think Tunnel Broker is
also a choice for UMAN and if asked in the market tell them try both and
see what you like best each have different properties.  And I hope there
are more good and innovative transition mechanisms invented the more the
better.  We will build many types of IPv6 networks I am sure we do not
have all the tools for transition done and all of the above will be used
and are useful for deployment.

/jim

> -- Friday, April 30, 2004 20:32:26 +0300 Pekka Savola 
> <pekkas@netcore.fi> wrote/a ecrit:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > (co-chair hat on)
> > 
> > As identified in the scenarios analysis at IETF59 and in 
> > draft-savola-v6ops-tunneling-01.txt, there appears to a need which 
> > cannot be filled by another mechanism for Teredo at least 
> in one major 
> > Unmanaged scenario.
> > 
> > Is there rough consensus to move forward with Teredo? 
> (i.e., to adopt 
> > it as WG document in this WG or elsewhere, for Proposed Standard.)
> > 
> > The main issue raised has been to call for a more extensive 
> analysis 
> > for the deployment implications of native, 6to4, and 
> Teredo.  There is 
> > already discussion of this in the Unmanaged Analysis 
> document.  There 
> > seemed to be very little energy or interest in the WG to drive this 
> > much further.
> > 
> > The options regarrding Teredo at this stage seem to be:
> > 
> >  a) Go forward with Teredo, hone the deployment implications in the 
> >     unmanaged analysis in parallel (if and as appropriate),
> > 
> >  b) Conclude that there is no sufficiently strong need for 
> Teredo, and 
> >     not support its advancement (for PS) at this stage, or
> > 
> >  c) Decide that we need to analyze the scenarios or deployment more 
> >     before being able to make a decision.  
> > 
> >     If so, please state where you believe more analysis is needed.. 
> >     and volunteer if possible :)
> > 
> > If you have an opinion, please state it within a week, 
> i.e., by next 
> > Friday, 7th May.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > (co-chair hat off)
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> Marc Blanchet
> Hexago
> tel: +1-418-266-5533x225
> ------------------------------------------
> http://www.freenet6.net: IPv6 connectivity
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>