|
As compared with the Teredo, Silkroad has the following
strongpoints:
1. it can provide the users with unchangeable IPv6 addresses, while Teredo address is altered every time the users restart the Teredo service. 2. Silkroad can deploy without the support of relay, while the Teredo needs the relay which advertises the reachability of Teredo Prefix. 3. Silkroad supports all types of NATs, while Teredo doesn't support symmetric NATs. >Hi,
>
>In draft-liumin-v6ops-silkroad-01.txt it is said that
Silkroad wants to enable nodes located behind one or several IPv4 NATs to obtain
>IPv6 connectivity and it seems like a tunnel-broker solution.
>It is known that Teredo is a automatic tunnel mechanism that figures out the same problem. >
>What's the difference between Silkroad and
Teredo?
>
>
>Best regards, >
>Crisy(Rengrong)
Wang
>======================================= >USC,EE-Systems |