Re: Teredo vs Silkroad

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 04:02:59PM +0800, Eiffel Wu wrote:
> 
>    As compared with the Teredo, Silkroad has the following strongpoints:
>    1.  it  can  provide the users with unchangeable IPv6 addresses, while
>    Teredo   address   is   altered  every  time  the  users  restart  the
>    Teredo service.
>    2.  Silkroad can deploy without the support of relay, while the Teredo
>    needs the relay which advertises the reachability of Teredo Prefix.
>    3.  Silkroad  supports all types of NATs, while Teredo doesn't support
>    symmetric NATs.

Any public implementations?

Tim