|
>From an analysis of the drafts, it appears that silkroad
is closer to
>tunnel brokers than to Teredo. Silkroad relies on the deployment of a >large number of relays and servers, that become part of the ISP >infrastructure: this is very similar to the deployment of tunnel servers >by the ISP. It provides pretty much the same advantages as tunnel >brokers, i.e. stable addresses and robust tunneling across different >types of infrastructure. > >The part of Silkroad that somewhat resemble Teredo is the routing >optimization between the tunnel servers (called SAR in silkroad). I >don't think that this is particularly valuable: once you have reached an >ISP router, you would expect normal routing protocols to take over and >route packets along the optimal path. In fact, this feature will be >perceived as detrimental by many ISP, since it makes their network >management more complex than necessary. Thanks for your advice, we will take it into
account.
I think it's not contradiction between Teredo and Silkroad.
They can be complemented with each other.
Eiffel Wu
|