RE: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-02.txt

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

I agree with Richard and this is not being dropped at all.

/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of rfgraveman@nac.net
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:02 AM
> To: Pekka Savola
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-02.txt
> 
> Pekka,
> 
> > ...
> > I think Example network C, a security defense network, is not 
> > mainstream enough to be applicable to be investigated in the 
> > scenarios.  There are probably 1, 5 or 10 such networks in 
> the world.
> > We should be focusing on more common scenarios (even addressing 
> > "80/20" would be good).  [I have a few specific comments for 
> > clarification within this example, but I'll send them if 
> this example 
> > is not replaced by something else.] ...
> 
> OTOH, some of these networks are large, and they buy a lot of 
> equipment, so some major vendors take their requirements 
> quite seriously. Therefore, I would be against dropping this 
> case. We can discuss further whether this is exactly the 
> right characterization, however.
> 
> Regards, Richard
> 
> 
> 
>