[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSTM

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: DSTM
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:19:05 +0200
In-reply-to: <E0D5F18A-C5BF-11D8-A349-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA09AC7D57@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.nt dev.microsoft.com> <20040623175329.GN17875@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk> <p0602048abcfff50a755c@[10.0.0.39]> <E0D5F18A-C5BF-11D8-A349-000A95CD987A@muada.com>

On 24-jun-04, at 11:21, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

It might be better to create an IPv4-in-IPv6 tunneling mechanism that treats the IPv6 network as an IPv4 link layer and run standard IPv4 protocols such as ARP and DHCP over that.

This also has the advantage that hosts within the same site don't have to go through a tunnel server in order to reach eachother.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

References:
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
- Re: DSTM
  - From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>

Prev by Date: Re: dynamic v4 addresses over v4-in-v6 tunnel [RE: DSTM]
Next by Date: Re: Dominant IPv6 Network deployment for Transition by Users
Previous by thread: Re: DSTM
Next by thread: Re: DSTM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread