Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirements-00.txt

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

I think this draft will have an easier future if the "R" word
("requirement") is replaced by "goal" and the normative MUSTs/SHOULDs
etc. are changed to lower case.

Requirements written in normative language always lead to a lot
of rather futile discussion.

(If you don't do this, the introduction needs the traditional
paragraph citing RFC 2119, which is listed in the references
but not cited in the text.)

The substance of the document seems good to me.

   Brian

Pekka Savola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (co-chair hat on)
>
> This is the WG Last Call for comments on sending
> draft-ietf-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirements-00.txt, "Requirements
> for assisted tunneling" to the IESG for consideration as Informational
> RFC:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirements-00.txt
>
> This document will be used as a basis for possible (re-)design of
> appropriate transition mechanisms.
>
> Please review the document carefully, and send your feedback to the
> list.  Please also indicate whether or not you believe that this
> document is ready to go to the IESG.
>
> The last call will end in about 3.5 weeks, on 9th August.  The large
> WGLC time is due to the IETF meeting.  It is recommended that
> participants read and comment prior to the IETF as the topic will be
> discussed there.
>
> Thanks!