[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
From: Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>
Date: 26 Jul 2004 17:32:40 +0000
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407261026490.7284-100000@netcore.fi>
References: <20040725214501.GB1184@vacation.karoshi.com.> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0407261026490.7284-100000@netcore.fi>
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

Considering the DNAME-baed renaming mechanism documented at
<http://www.isc.org/pubs/tn/isc-tn-2002-1.txt>, what I wonder
is, why doesn't Bill Manning just put in a DNAME at IP6.INT
renaming the whole tree to point at IP6.ARPA?

Older client implementations will be out there forever.  The
right transition mechanism might be "all at once, and forever."
-- 
Paul Vixie

References:
- Re: [sig-ipv6] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
  - From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
- Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: RE: [sig-ipv6] Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 :ip6.int shutdown?)
Next by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-templin-v6v4inet-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Next by thread: Re: 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread