[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

To: "Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:42:39 -0700
Cc: "'Soininen Jonne '" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com> (Nokia-NET/Helsinki), "'v6ops@ops.ietf.org '" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5639D05@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se>
References: <Thu@edgemail1.central.sun.com> <37FB7AA6F5F9814FB634A7BF4C35A6F5639D05@ESEALNT442.al.sw.ericsson.se>


On Jul 29, 2004, at 3:39 PM, Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB) wrote:

I agree with Jonne. ISATAP is the most promising solution
for 3gpp tunnelling

For the sake of the discussion, could the ISATAP proponents summarize why they think ISATAP is a better fit than a tunnel broker solution based on draft-ietf-v6ops-assisted-tunneling-requirements-00.txt. in a 3GPP environment?

	- Alain.

References:
- RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
  - From: "Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by Date: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Previous by thread: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by thread: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread