Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Tim Chown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:06:55AM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > 
> > 6to4 is already Proposed Standard, so its status is not currently
> > under discussion. Deployment is its own reward.
> 
> I was only commenting on Jonne's list, which includes tunnel broker (an
> existing RFC) but not 6to4.   The list should be draft-only, or all
> mechanisms, I think, to avoid confusion.

It is draft-only, in the sense that the tunnel broker RFC (3053) does
not document the actual protocol, just the concept.  If we go down
that path, an additional spec would be needed.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings