[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms



On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:06:55AM +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> 6to4 is already Proposed Standard, so its status is not currently
> under discussion. Deployment is its own reward.

I was only commenting on Jonne's list, which includes tunnel broker (an
existing RFC) but not 6to4.   The list should be draft-only, or all
mechanisms, I think, to avoid confusion.

Tim