RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

["Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>]

I agree that it could be very simple, Isatap - as one example - is :-).

I did look at the non-registered mode (too).
It still requires NAT-traversal, firewall traversal, extensibility...

Karen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pekka Savola [mailto:pekkas@netcore.fi]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 2:07 AM
> To: Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)
> Cc: 'Alain.Durand@Sun.COM'; Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB); 
> 'Soininen Jonne ';
> 'v6ops@ops.ietf.org '
> Subject: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
> 
> 
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED) wrote:
> > Something else I perhaps forgot to stress in my answer, is that 3GPP
> > explicitly demands a lightweight protocol - tailored for usage on
> > mobile devices for a limited time only,
> > draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis-10.txt - a protocol fulfilling the
> > requirements of your document seems to be anything but that.
> 
> Please look at the 'non-registered mode' in the document.  It 
> could be 
> *very* simple.
> 
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>