RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

["Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>]

It may or it may not end up being lightweight.
For 3GPP lightweight however is demanded.

Karen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alain.Durand@Sun.COM [mailto:Alain.Durand@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 6:41 AM
> To: Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)
> Cc: 'Pekka Savola'; Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB); 'Soininen Jonne ';
> 'v6ops@ops.ietf.org '
> Subject: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
> 
> 
> Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED) wrote:
> > Alain,
> > 
> > Something else I perhaps forgot to stress in my answer, is
> > that 3GPP explicitly demands a lightweight protocol - 
> tailored for usage
> > on mobile devices for a limited time only, 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis-10.txt 
>  >
> >- a protocol fulfilling the requirements of your document 
> seems to be anything but that.
> 
> 
> Until we made an analysis of the existing protocols that 
> could be taken 
> as is or augmented to satisfy the "goals", it is not fair to say that
> the protocol will not be "lightweight".
> 
> 	- Alain.
> 
> 
>