[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

To: "Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 21:41:10 -0700
Cc: "'Pekka Savola'" <pekkas@netcore.fi>, "Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>, "'Soininen Jonne '" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>, "'v6ops@ops.ietf.org '" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <C26BB8276599A44B85D52F9CE41035E1050B954F@esealnt944.al.sw.ericsson.se>
References: <C26BB8276599A44B85D52F9CE41035E1050B954F@esealnt944.al.sw.ericsson.se>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040601

Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED) wrote:

Alain,
Something else I perhaps forgot to stress in my answer, is that 3GPP explicitly demands a lightweight protocol - tailored for usage on mobile devices for a limited time only, draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis-10.txt

>

- a protocol fulfilling the requirements of your document seems to be anything but that.

Until we made an analysis of the existing protocols that could be taken as is or augmented to satisfy the "goals", it is not fair to say that the protocol will not be "lightweight".

	- Alain.

References:
- RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
  - From: "Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by Date: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Previous by thread: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by thread: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread