[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms

To: "Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>
Subject: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 03:07:03 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: "'Alain.Durand@Sun.COM'" <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>, "Karim El-Malki (AL/EAB)" <karim.el-malki@ericsson.com>, "'Soininen Jonne '" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>, "'v6ops@ops.ietf.org '" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <C26BB8276599A44B85D52F9CE41035E1050B954F@esealnt944.al.sw.ericsson.se>

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED) wrote:
> Something else I perhaps forgot to stress in my answer, is that 3GPP
> explicitly demands a lightweight protocol - tailored for usage on
> mobile devices for a limited time only,
> draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-analysis-10.txt - a protocol fulfilling the
> requirements of your document seems to be anything but that.

Please look at the 'non-registered mode' in the document.  It could be 
*very* simple.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

References:
- RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
  - From: "Karen E. Nielsen (AH/TED)" <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by Date: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Previous by thread: RE: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Next by thread: Re: Proposed way forward with the transition mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread