Re: IESG evaluation draft-ietf-v6ops-ent-scenarios-05

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > 1)
> > [rhousley] [IN IESG DISCUSSION]
> >   Should VoIP be discussed in this document?  There are usually QoS
> >   issues associated with VoIP that deserve consideration.
> 
> I think that would be quite a substantial amount of work, so although
> the comment is valid, I would recommend leaving it aside.

Couldn't that be (possibly) just "hand-waved" by adding one or two 
bullet points, e.g.:

 - does the site use VoIP or similar systems?  Does this require 
special QoS considerations?  Are the phones, backend systems, etc. 
upgradeable to IPv6?

i.e., give a lead, but not flesh it out?

> > I can't quite reconcile "external network" and "external
> > connectivity not required" - this needs a little clarification.
> 
> Maybe changing 'an external' to 'a different' would be enough,
> and that can be done by the RFC-Ed.

Would seem an OK (and simple) approach unless there are other 
thoughts.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings