Follen, Stephen wrote:
This so called "flexibility" to configure a tunnel without the existence a IPv4 interface, basically indicates that the box allows the creation of avirtual point to point link, and
route(s) that are using it, when there is no physical connectivity to provide the basis for that link (and routes) to exist.
I do not see the advantage to the user, but can certainly see the headaches...
The virtual point to point link's (the tunnel's) oper status is held
down
I thought so, 'cause otherwise would have been really a bug.
until there is an interface configured with the source address,
...so you the implementation does check the source address...
also until there is a route to the remote v4 destination, etc.
I'm not trying to debate the fine points of a particular implementation here; my point was only that these are implementation details.
They are implementation details indeed...
[...]
There are lots of way one can follow most any spec and still not have things work properly - misconfiguration is always possible.
That's the whole point...
[...]
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature