Re: DHCP issue in draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>]

Hi Daniel,

My original email was in v6ops, because I think is that WG who should decide
about if the document (draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt) need
to keep or not the DHCP solution for "controlled networks".

I agree with your comment, let's see what the rest of the WG say.

Regards,
Jordi

> De: Soohong Daniel Park <soohong.park@samsung.com>
> Responder a: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Fecha: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:12:09 +0900
> Para: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, jordi.palet@consulintel.es
> CC: Dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
> Asunto: RE: DHCP issue in draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt
> 
>> I'm not considering DHCP at all. May be need to be further
>> clarified. Is one more option, but more related, in my opinion,
>> to very controlled networks where you are sure that DHCP
>> options are relayed. We can even delete this section if it
>> creates confusion.
> 
> *controlled networks* is also important domain for adopting
> IPv6 widely, especially enterprise network is entirely controlled
> by network administrator. Also enabling DHCP is quite normal,
> cheap and a widely deployed scenario. This solution works
> very well within our enterprise network.
> 
>> Thoughts from the WG well be needed here !
> 
> Which WG do you mean ? DHC WG or V6OPS WG or both ?
> 
> 
>    Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
>    Mobile Platform Lab. Samsung Electronics.
> 
> 
> 



**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.