[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A, CNAME or both issue on draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: A, CNAME or both issue on draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt
From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:38:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <BDAC9641.4D30C%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <BDA1A8D4.4B856%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <BDAC9641.4D30C%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>

If the question is "Is there any need to make an explicit CNAME query
when what one is really looking for is an A RR?", the answer is "No".

References:
- Re: comments on draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-00.txt
  - From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
- A, CNAME or both issue on draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt
  - From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>

Prev by Date: Re: WG process etc. [Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios]
Next by Date: Re: draft-nielsen-v6ops-3GPP-zeroconf-goals-00.txt
Previous by thread: A, CNAME or both issue on draft-palet-v6ops-solution-tun-auto-disc-01.txt
Next by thread: Responses to comments sent on ml for the draft-aoun-natpt-deprecate draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread