Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>]

Ok. So then we should be fair enough also with the rest of the documents and
ask the same question, and see if there is any objection.

Regards,
Jordi


> De: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
> Responder a: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Fecha: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:25:21 +0200 (EET)
> Para: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Asunto: Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
>> Fair enough.  Please send the objections (if any) on document
>> adoption by the end of Tuesday 2nd November at the latest.
>> 
>> Comments/review on the drafts themselves are still welcome!
> 
> (hat on)
> 
> As there were no specific objections to adopting these documents,
> there appears to be rough consensus on taking these as WG items.
> 
> Let's continue the WG last call as called out earlier.
> 
> *** We really need the reviews, and that means *YOU* too! :) ***
> 
> (hat off)
> 
> 



**********************************
Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
Presentations and videos on line at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.