[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios

To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 19:25:21 +0200 (EET)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410300932370.7022@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410291149220.9900@netcore.fi> <20041030040506.GA3476@nokia.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410300932370.7022@netcore.fi>

Hi,

On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:

Fair enough. Please send the objections (if any) on document adoption by the end of Tuesday 2nd November at the latest.

Comments/review on the drafts themselves are still welcome!


(hat on)

As there were no specific objections to adopting these documents, there appears to be rough consensus on taking these as WG items.

Let's continue the WG last call as called out earlier.

*** We really need the reviews, and that means *YOU* too! :) ***

(hat off)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
  - From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>

References:
- WG last call on tunneling scenarios
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
  - From: David Kessens <david.kessens@nokia.com>
- Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

Prev by Date: RE: IPsec support for NAT-PT in IPv6
Next by Date: Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
Previous by thread: Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
Next by thread: Re: WG last call on tunneling scenarios
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread