On Fri, 05 Nov 2004 22:48:16 +0100, Gert Doering said: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 04:31:46PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: >> So 40% isn't even *allocated* yet (saying that we're probably burning /8's >> faster than needed, but only 36% of the available space is actually routed. >> >> Sounds to me like we've got more time than 52 months, if we start doing >> stuff now to increase the usage efficiencies.... > > Do we really *want* that? > > I'd rather go for "legacy-free networks". Ditch v4, build proper v6 > networks. Well.. that *would* be a preferable solution. I was merely pointing out that we're not quite as "up against the wall" as a projection of the burn rate of /8's would indicate.
Attachment:
pgpjMuoyDIY9N.pgp
Description: PGP signature