Re: Consensus for moving NAT-PT to experimental?

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:09:59PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >the right thing to do would be to
> >revise the RFC to take out DNS-ALG sections and include use-case scenarios,
> >limitations and applicability statement.
> 
> I understood that was the plan, but with the first step being
> to reclassify the RFC to make it clear there are serious issues
> with it. I support the reclassification.
> 

I agree - a large health warning is required on NAT-PT as currently
described in the RFC.   But yes what you say is a likely path forward.

Tim