Re: proposed new v6ops charter

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-11-13, at 12.42, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> FYI. The IPv6 distributed security has been presented in the security 
> area
> in IETF60, has been sent to their list, inputs had been requested, 
> etc.,
> etc., etc. No reply at all !
>
> This is my fear about what it can happen with other works if they 
> don't fit
> in v6ops and are *ignored* by other WGs that should take care of it. 
> Is an
> issue, and probably requires some "mandate" from the IESG or IAB ?

As I said at the microphone in D.C, I think the issue then is to get 
the relevant groups interested rather than "let's do it anyway"....or 
maybe conclude that the particular work item (in general, not referring 
directly to you) perhaps is not interesting?

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQZj326arNKXTPFCVEQK42QCdEX2XMrF6rYzIgxUA+kaDdBeje8MAmQEz
Neq+So+tVWA9+fv3m/5vC4ZC
=8EuQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----