Re: proposed new v6ops charter

["EricLKlein" <ericlklein@softhome.net>]

> JORDI
> Let's try to see it from another perspective.
>
> Some people at v6ops believes is interesting and necessary to working in
> topic "a". This topic fits very well in WG "x" charter, but WG "x", don't
> care (may be they are not sufficiently aware about IPv6, or they have
> already too much work, etc.). If the v6ops people can't convince (or they
> don't have enough "participants" to be strong enough in WG "x"), this not
> necessarily means that topic "a" is not interesting, right ? Is more a
> question of newcomers with more work starting to participate in an
existing
> WG which is already busy ...
>
Maybe it is time that the people from V6Ops that feel this is important join
the security WG and start discussions there.
1. There is no real limit on WGs that you join, just limits on the time you
can contribute
2. Maybe if new people start talking and discussing this they will start to
understand and will start to work on it too.

Eric