Re: Consensus for moving NAT-PT to experimental?

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

(co-chair hat on)

There is rough consensus for moving NAT-PT to experimental.

Authors, please revise the draft by removing the considerations about 
the scenarios, and just listing NAT-PT issues, and pass it by the 
chairs; let's submit the next version as a WG document.

(hat off)

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
> (co-chair hat on)
>
> At the meeting, there was almost unanimous consensus for moving NAT-PT to 
> experimental.
>
> The approach which seemed to have significant support was splitting the 
> document draft-aoun-v6ops-natpt-deprecate-00.txt in two: the one describing 
> issues (which would also request the reclassification), and one describing 
> different usage (or non-usage) scenarios.
>
> If you believe this is a bad approach, please voice your concerns within a 
> week, by 18th November.  Thanks!
>
> (hat off)

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings