Need a suggestion ...

[Salman Asadullah <sasad@cisco.com>]

Hello All,

We would like to take a quick poll from the group regarding structure of 
our following draft, ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access 
Networks:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-asadullah-v6ops-bb-deployment-scenarios-01.txt

Currently this draft is ~ 60 pages long, we would like to know if we should 
keep it the way it is or split it into 4 different drafts (~15-20 pages 
each) based on technology (DSL, Cable, ETTH, Wireless).

We are hearing two opinions:

1.  We should keep it the way it is, its long but complete and acts as a 
"one stop shop".   Reader can choose the section of interest easily.

2.  We should split the draft, it would result in a smaller technology 
specific draft and eventually more hits.  If we split the draft, there 
could be two options of doing it.

Option 2A: Section 1,2,3,4,5 (these are general section and pretty much 
applies to every BB technology) will be replicated in all 4 drafts. So, we 
will have 4 drafts in total.

Option 2B: Section 1,2,3,4,5 is part of a "general draft" followed by one 
paragraph for each technology where we refer the reader to the new 
technology specific draft.  So, we will have 5 drafts in total (1 general + 
4 technology specific).

Please let us know your thoughts, which route we should take.

Thank you all.

Regards,
Salman