Re: Take VLAN usage as WG document?

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:54:57AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:28:43AM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > However, it's also worth documenting the concerns raised by Heikki 
> > Vatiainen wrt. the enterprise document that separate IP topologies in 
> > the same links are likely to cause maintenance nightmares in the long 
> > term.  We certainly had those concerns ourselves.
> 
> I agree.  It makes documentation and troubleshooting harder (now 
> *which* router is that machine connected to?), and also brings up some 
> security issues ("is the v6 ACL in sync with the v4 ACL?").
> 
> The security issues are mentioned already, though.

If the document is adopted, then we can certainly add a section on
limitations and operational issues with the approach, though those are
included to some extent in the text as is.

Tim