Re: Need a suggestion ...

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

Keep one.

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:37:19AM +0200, EricLKlein wrote:
> I prefer the one draft method. Multiple drafts may mean more hits, but it
> will mean having to look at multiple drafts if you are utilizing different
> technologies (as many ISPs are) or worse trying to use one for multiple
> technologies.
> 
> Eric
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Salman Asadullah" <sasad@cisco.com>
> To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Cc: "Ciprian Popoviciu" <cpopovic@cisco.com>; "adeel Ahmed"
> <adahmed@cisco.com>; "Patrick Grossetete" <pgrosset@cisco.com>
> Sent: 01 December, 2004 1:47 AM
> Subject: Need a suggestion ...
> 
> 
> > Hello All,
> >
> > We would like to take a quick poll from the group regarding structure of
> > our following draft, ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access
> > Networks:
> >
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-asadullah-v6ops-bb-deployment-scenarios-01.txt
> >
> > Currently this draft is ~ 60 pages long, we would like to know if we
> should
> > keep it the way it is or split it into 4 different drafts (~15-20 pages
> > each) based on technology (DSL, Cable, ETTH, Wireless).
> >
> > We are hearing two opinions:
> >
> > 1.  We should keep it the way it is, its long but complete and acts as a
> > "one stop shop".   Reader can choose the section of interest easily.
> >
> > 2.  We should split the draft, it would result in a smaller technology
> > specific draft and eventually more hits.  If we split the draft, there
> > could be two options of doing it.
> >
> > Option 2A: Section 1,2,3,4,5 (these are general section and pretty much
> > applies to every BB technology) will be replicated in all 4 drafts. So, we
> > will have 4 drafts in total.
> >
> > Option 2B: Section 1,2,3,4,5 is part of a "general draft" followed by one
> > paragraph for each technology where we refer the reader to the new
> > technology specific draft.  So, we will have 5 drafts in total (1 general
> +
> > 4 technology specific).
> >
> > Please let us know your thoughts, which route we should take.
> >
> > Thank you all.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Salman
> >
> >
> 
> 

-- 
Tim