|
Oops! Point 3 below is just an unfortunate mistake.
Thanks for ingnoring it. My apologies to authors and to the group. Points 1 and 2 on the other hand relmain valid in my view. Rémi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rémi Després" <remi.despres@wanadoo.fr> To: "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com> Cc: "v6ops" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:52 PM Subject: Re: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt > Hi, > > > Three points: > > 1. Teredo Client definition > The current definition "A node that has some access to the IPv4 Internet > and wants to gain access to the IPv6 Internet" is IMHO much too large. > It could advantageously be become something like: > "A node that has some access to the IPv4 Internet via an IPv4-only node > where NAT is operational, and that wants to gain access to the IPv6 > Internet" > > 2. NAT definition > The document neither includes a definition of NATs, nor refers to a > document which does it. > It would help if the scope of NATs considered in the document would be > concisely delimited, e.g. with a definition like: "NATs referred to in this > document are IPv4-only mechanisms which, at least for some restricted > applications, provide access to the IPv4 global address space from some IPv4 > private address spaces. They use for this stateful translation of addresses > and possibly of port numbers ." > > 3. Page numbers. > In the table of contents page numbers exceed by 1 the appropriate values. > Fixing it would improve the document. > > Rémi > (These points were made in a mail already answered by Eric Klein but, sent > from an unregistered address, didn't appear in the mailin list.) > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Margaret Wasserman" <margaret@thingmagic.com> > To: <ericlklein@softhome.net>; <henrik@levkowetz.com>; > <karen.e.nielsen@ericsson.com>; <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>; > <Markku.Ala-Vannesluoma@nokia.com>; "Jonathan Rosenberg" > <jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com> > Cc: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org> > Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 4:47 PM > Subject: draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt > > > > > > Hi Eric, Henrik, Karen, Francis, Markku and Jonathan, > > > > There is a new version of the Teredo draft available at: > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huitema-v6ops-teredo-03.txt > > > > Could you check whether this version addresses the issues that you > > raised during IETF LC? It would be best if you could review this > > document and return any feedback by this Thursday, 9-Dec-04. > > > > If there are no further objections, I will place this draft on the > > IESG agenda for consideration on our 16-Dec-04 telechat. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Margaret > > > > > > > > > > |