[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TCP/UDP relay vs. SOCKS64

To: Renxiang.Yan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn
Subject: Re: TCP/UDP relay vs. SOCKS64
From: itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino)
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:44:12 +0900 (JST)
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:01:30 +0800" <8634B809B90D6E4AACA4AB0562A1F07205EE05@bellnet-mail3.sbell.com.cn>
References: <8634B809B90D6E4AACA4AB0562A1F07205EE05@bellnet-mail3.sbell.com.cn>

> In RFC 3142, it states: 
> 
>    TRT is designed to require no extra modification on IPv6-only
>    initiating hosts, nor that on IPv4-only destination hosts. 
> 
> but in fact, the host is required modification, e.g. DNS resolver. 

	nope.  DNS resolver does not need to be modified.  cache DNS server
	needs to synthesize records, and clients need to use specific cache
	DNS server (which does synthesize).

itojun

References:
- TCP/UDP relay vs. SOCKS64
  - From: "CTO YAN Renxiang" <Renxiang.Yan@alcatel-sbell.com.cn>

Prev by Date: re: TCP/UDP relay vs. SOCKS64
Next by Date: Letest revision of "ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in BB Access Networks"
Previous by thread: Re: TCP/UDP relay vs. SOCKS64
Next by thread: re: TCP/UDP relay vs. SOCKS64
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread