[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?

To: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Subject: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:03:29 +0100
Cc: sasad@cisco.com, cpopovic@cisco.com, adahmed@cisco.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=sDF6hw4f/zJd0eGamvL67TJ1+cmJenDTbQOyk51Gs4U8xN8T3xEXcPbNUCpjzdzv ;
In-reply-to: <20050121100629.P4545@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501210921420.7911@netcore.fi> <20050121100629.P4545@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:29:33PM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> I don't see any L3 awareness of BRAS (or LAC) here. Where I miss a point?

Eventually it might be desireable to run L2TP over IPv6.  

But I'm not sure whether this is what the original authors aim at.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  71007  (66629)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>

References:
- Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>

Prev by Date: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Next by Date: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Previous by thread: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Next by thread: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread