[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?

To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Subject: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 15:08:09 +0100 (CET)
Cc: sasad@cisco.com, cpopovic@cisco.com, adahmed@cisco.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20050125130329.GJ84850@Space.Net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501210921420.7911@netcore.fi> <20050121100629.P4545@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <20050125130329.GJ84850@Space.Net>


On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Gert Doering wrote:

Hi,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:29:33PM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
I don't see any L3 awareness of BRAS (or LAC) here. Where I miss a point?
Eventually it might be desireable to run L2TP over IPv6.

Hi, I think this is an option if Network Access Providers upgrading their networks to support IPv6. Thanks for the comment.

Regards,

	Janos Mohacsi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Adeel Ahmed <adahmed@cisco.com>

References:
- Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Mohacsi Janos <mohacsi@niif.hu>
- Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
  - From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Next by Date: RE: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Previous by thread: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Next by thread: Re: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread