[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?



Hi Alan,

Thanks for reviewing the document.

Yes, the customer router should be able to do stateless autoconfiguration as already pointed out by Gert Doering.

Kind Regards,
Adeel Ahmed.

At 04:32 PM 1/21/2005 +0800, Alan Chang wrote:
Hi,

I have read 01 revision and just focus what I'm interested in 02.

At page 26,

   If a Customer Router is present:

   B. It dynamically acquires through stateless autoconfiguration the
   address for the link between itself and the Edge Router. This step
   is followed by a DHCP-PD [RFC 3633] request for a prefix shorter then
   /64 that in turn is divided in /64s and assigned to its interfaces
   connecting the hosts on the customer site.

Does this mean the router can do stateless autoconfiguration?
>From what I can remember, a node can be only a host (receive RA) or a router
(send RA).

Thanks.

-Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Pekka Savola
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 3:25 PM
To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Take ISP BB scenarios as WG document?

Hi,

(co-chair hat on)

The authors have asked if the following document would be adopted as WG
item:

"ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access Networks"
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-asadullah-v6ops-bb-deployment-scen
arios-02.txt

Please say what you think.  Silence DOES NOT indicate consent.  If new work
items are to be adopted, there must be active support for doing it, and
there must be people willing to review and work on the draft.

The deadline for comments is in 2 weeks, on February 4th.

(hat off)

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings