Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-nap-00.txt & NAT security [2.2]

[Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org>]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:27:24 +0930
Mark Smith <ipng@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> wrote:

> Yes and no :-)
>

<snip>
 
> Summarising, I'd like to see IPv6 used as an opporunity to introduce and
> promote new thinking (well old, but new to most IPv4 people), and
> provide "new" models of deployment. However, for those who are more
> resistant to new thinking, identify "old" IPv4 mechanisms and how they
> can work with IPv6 as a "fall back" alternative to new thinking or as
> part of a migrationary path to "new thinking".
> 

To clarify, I'm making broad statements about IPv6 deployment, rather
than specifically the NAP draft. Some of my comments would apply to the
NAP Draft though.

Regards,
Mark.

-- 

    The Internet's nature is peer to peer.