[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts



Well, on my notes I have the question Alain asked at the end that was: "Who would be happy if TC just take TSP and make it an RFC?" You don't mention this question that had a large majority of yes. Then I would be happy to get the "official" minutes as well :)

Jerome



Pekka Savola wrote:

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Jerome Durand wrote:

Opinions?


I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a non-event. There was an agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to say that the WG should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, and make it a standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction.


It will be interesting to see BoF minutes, because I didn't see large majority. For what it's worth, my recollection was:

I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting TSP.
I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting doing something new.
I saw less than about 5-10 people being comfortable with existing
  mechanisms (like L2TP).

Bottom line is that if we don't need to care about the RTT and overhead concerns at all, I can't clearly see real benefits for TSP instead of just using L2TP.