Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-exprmntl-00.txt

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> I beleive that the items inherited from IPv4 NAT are basically at the 
> 'section' level in this document.  Alain's point could be covered by adding a 
> paragraph to the introduction which lists the section numbers which are 
> common to any NAT-like solution.  I think the list is ss 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5, 
> 2.6, plus the basic underlying issues in ss 3.2-3.4.

I support this; let's not do anything more major than that.  While it 
would be useful to also identify the generic NAT issues (the document 
does), rearranging the text at section level would not be wise because 
the issues are still slightly different and one would have to 
generalize, losing the current NAT-PT focus.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings