Re: WG Last Call draft-ietf-v6ops-nap*

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 12:54:15PM +0300, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:
> 
> 2) Section 2.6: The section nicely explains the situation with the IPv4
> address space. However, I have recently met misunderstanding of the size
> of the private address space. There seems to be a belief out there that
> private address space is limitless. 
> Would it be appropriate to add some words to address this issue as well?
> (E.g. "Even the use of private (RFC1918) IPv4 address space has its
> practical limits. Especially, in large network environments the private
> address space can be exhausted resulting to difficult or even impossible
> operational problems") I'm not sure, though, if it is appropriate in
> this particular section.

Good point.  I think this issue should be stressed somewhere.  
 
Tim