Re: Enterprise Analysis DSTM Issue

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

On Aug 10, 2005, at 6:34 AM, Pekka Savola wrote:
> We need to separate "use of v4-in-v6 tunnels as a concept" from  
> "DSTM the protocol".  Fleshing it out or removing it seem the only  
> choices.

So what I hear you arguing for, which I think is consistent with  
Tim's comments, is that this section should say that we require a  
tunneling solution which might use a variety of tunnel approaches  
including virtual circuit networks including MPLS, IP/IP, IP/GRE,  
IPSEC Tunnel Mode, and so on, and that in addition a common  
rendezvous mechanism is required. DSTM is an example of a rendezvous  
mechanism, as are the DNS-ALG in NATPT, the mechanism in Silkroad,  
and so on, and v6tc-or-whatever is chartered to come up with that  
mechanism.

Am I correct?