[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re:
- To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
- Subject: Re:
- From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:17:30 -0700
- Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
- Cc: "Lindqvist Erik Kurt" <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=434; t=1125439994; x=1125872194; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=Subject:Re=3A=20| From:Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com>| Date:Tue,=2030=20Aug=202005=2015=3A17=3A30=20-0700| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DUS-ASCII=3B=20delsp=3Dyes=3B=20format=3Dflowed| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=RKkH7NppxH0h8eP//KhIaS9C1tj5NU6serQqXnIrpe/RnClUAvFboonsUMmxNciL+FK1sWUj E3qUJEVFMw3m4ThWaHNkUReyma398+Fs9E6W8pJdW2RQOZSUP0ldgkId4eH0KugYYbRoDS8M/8I SRhQPehxx+NHxwLjTjBRT5fQ=
- In-reply-to: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10D4FF1@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
- References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10D4FF1@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
On Aug 29, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
So, can we call this a new (extension, mechanism, method, etc.)
instead of a new protocol and run it past the v6ops charter again?
If it uses IPv4 fields but re-interprets them in a way that RFCs 791,
1122/3, 1812, 1349, and 2474 don't discuss, it is a change to IPv4. I
would suggest discussing it in a working group that suggests
modifications to IPv4. If it's implemented in a header outside of
IPv4, it's a new protocol, and needs to be discussed in a WG that
deals with that.
- References:
- [no subject]
- From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>