[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: your mail

To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: your mail
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:24:11 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Lindqvist Erik Kurt <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10D4FF1@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10D4FF1@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Templin, Fred L wrote:

So, can we call this a new (extension, mechanism, method, etc.)
instead of a new protocol and run it past the v6ops charter again?

I do not think this fits in the charter of the group no matter how it's termed; I don't think we do either mechanisms (encapsulations) OR v4 enhancements.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

References:
- [no subject]
  - From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>

Prev by Date: [no subject]
Next by Date: Re: WGLC ent-analysis-03: DSTM
Previous by thread: [no subject]
Next by thread: Re:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread