[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt

To: shogunx <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
Subject: Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 05:34:07 -0700
Cc: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510161941290.3866-100000@sleekfreak.ath.cx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0510161941290.3866-100000@sleekfreak.ath.cx>

if you have a v6-only domain - and these already exist - and you wantv4 to run over it, that's you're only option.


On Oct 16, 2005, at 4:41 PM, shogunx wrote:

Why tunnel v over v6?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt
  - From: shogunx <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>

References:
- Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt
  - From: shogunx <shogunx@sleekfreak.ath.cx>

Prev by Date: New version of draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-expermentl(-02)
Next by Date: Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread