Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt

[Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>]

you might check the nanog list. There is an active discussion of the  
use of 6to4 operationally on it right now.

On Oct 17, 2005, at 12:49 AM, Tim Chown wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:10:47PM -0400, Durand, Alain wrote:
>
> > d) 6over4 as a transition mechanism isn't used much, it might be  
> > simpler to just suggest to
> >     either deprecate it or rename it, then restoring the original  
> > "foo over bar" terminology
> >     as semantically equivalent to "foo in far".
>
> I have not seen any active use of 6over4.   Given the huge (and  
> potentially
> confusing) pool of transition/integration solutions already on the  
> table,
> we should consider deprecating it.
>
> Tim