Re: RV: I-D ACTION:draft-baker-v6ops-end2end-00.txt

[Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:10:47PM -0400, Durand, Alain wrote:
>  
> d) 6over4 as a transition mechanism isn't used much, it might be simpler to just suggest to
>     either deprecate it or rename it, then restoring the original "foo over bar" terminology
>     as semantically equivalent to "foo in far".

I have not seen any active use of 6over4.   Given the huge (and potentially
confusing) pool of transition/integration solutions already on the table, 
we should consider deprecating it.

Tim