[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG Document Question on draft-chown-v6ops-campus-transition-03

I believe that the outcome of yesterday's meeting was that he would divide it into two documents, one stable and one ongoing, the stable one would be a working group document, and would be published as informational by the WG following appropriate discussion. 

On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Bound, Jim wrote:


Folks,
I believe today in trying to be silent in IETF WG meetings unless it is 
truly urgent technical issue I have as individual with a spec.  I am
sending this mail as I believe Tim Chown work on Campus transition
should be a working group document. I think it is good operational
example and brings out discussion of VLANs too which is important and
many other operational requirements other forms of deployment will face.
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/internet-drafts/draft-chown-v6ops- camp 
us-transition-03.txt

Thanks
/jim