RE: WG Document Question on draft-chown-v6ops-campus-transition-03

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

That works yes sorry I did not glean that one.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Baker [mailto:fred@cisco.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:50 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: WG Document Question on 
> draft-chown-v6ops-campus-transition-03
> 
> I believe that the outcome of yesterday's meeting was that he 
> would divide it into two documents, one stable and one 
> ongoing, the stable one would be a working group document, 
> and would be published as informational by the WG following 
> appropriate discussion.
> 
> On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Bound, Jim wrote:
> 
> > Folks,
> >
> > I believe today in trying to be silent in IETF WG meetings 
> unless it 
> > is truly urgent technical issue I have as individual with a 
> spec.  I 
> > am sending this mail as I believe Tim Chown work on Campus 
> transition 
> > should be a working group document. I think it is good operational 
> > example and brings out discussion of VLANs too which is 
> important and 
> > many other operational requirements other forms of deployment will 
> > face.
> >
> > ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/internet-drafts/draft-chown-v6ops-
> > camp
> > us-transition-03.txt
> >
> > Thanks
> > /jim
>